Friday, January 31, 2014

Solid and unspectacular

Looking at the bar chart of my stack size over the course of last night's session, nothing really stands out. I played solid, unspectacular poker, and that's just the way I like it. Of course, I don't always get that chance. The style of your opponents largely dictates the style of play which will be effective for you, and sometimes, solid play is not much of an option. That sounds odd, but it's really true. When the rag trade hits town, you're forced to take more chances. I don't mean that you're ever forced to make stupid choices, but if you're playing against highly volatile players, you have to be more volatile yourself in order to keep up. I prefer playing against players who aren't too volatile. They're easier to read, and they're more susceptible to being bluffed. I guess you could say I like playing against players who play like me, only not as well :-)

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 89 hands and saw flop:
 - 6 out of 10 times while in big blind (60%)
 - 10 out of 13 times while in small blind (76%)
 - 34 out of 66 times in other positions (51%)
 - a total of 50 out of 89 (56%)
 Pots won at showdown - 5 of 11 (45%)
 Pots won without showdown - 13

delta: $37,638
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,446,392
balance: $7,803,345

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Killer rockets

Last night, though I hit the felt three times, that wasn't the most memorable thing about the session. The most memorable thing was the killer rockets. Fully seven times, one of the players at the table was dealt rockets (pocket aces), and that player won the pot all seven times. That's very unusual; normally, the aces would have been cracked at least once. It felt so unusual, I was inspired to write another utility to see if those seven killer rockets were the most I'd ever seen in a session. It turns out they were, by a hair. Here are the top ten killer rockets counts:

  7 (152) 2014\0129
  6 (300) 2013\0611
  6 (143) 2013\0721
  5 (140) 2013\0906
  5 (112) 2013\0811
  4 (209) 2013\0919
  4 (168) 2013\0808
  4 (153) 2013\0519
 
  4 (132) 2013\0424
  4 (150) 2012\0626

After reupping for the third time, I was able to recoup almost half of my losses.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 152 hands and saw flop:
 - 17 out of 19 times while in big blind (89%)
 - 13 out of 20 times while in small blind (65%)
 - 55 out of 113 times in other positions (48%)
 - a total of 85 out of 152 (55%)
 Pots won at showdown - 8 of 18 (44%)
 Pots won without showdown - 9

delta: $-79,355
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,408,754
balance: $7,765,707

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

The rag trade

Every so often, I encounter the rag trade on PokerStars. That is, players who bet absurd amounts with nothing but rags, and then glory in showing them when everyone else folds. Last night, at one time there were at least two rag men at the table, and possibly three. On one hand, the most flagrant rag man was shameless enough to fold a pair of kings to the second most flagrant rag man, and then show them to the table. It's not a lot of fun playing against rag men; every now and then they'll actually have a hand. That's what did me in on hand 78; flagrant rag man #1 flopped two pair, and I ended up hitting the felt. I breathed a sigh of relief when the rag men left en masse, some hands later. I was able to make a comeback and end the night with a small profit.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 104 hands and saw flop:
 - 5 out of 13 times while in big blind (38%)
 - 4 out of 14 times while in small blind (28%)
 - 28 out of 77 times in other positions (36%)
 - a total of 37 out of 104 (35%)
 Pots won at showdown - 4 of 7 (57%)
 Pots won without showdown - 5

delta: $2,495
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,488,109
balance: $7,845,062

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Variance

Last night, my stack took some wild swings. That's known in the business as variance. To succeed in poker, you need to be able to deal with variance. I've found that for me, the best way to deal with it is to keep playing :-) I hit the felt on hand 20, then played another 98 hands after reupping. I ended the night with a tiny profit. It was another pride and sorrow session; I lost a whopping $217,135 on my losing hands. That clocks in as the third largest amount I've ever lost in a winning session.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 118 hands and saw flop:
 - 12 out of 16 times while in big blind (75%)
 - 9 out of 15 times while in small blind (60%)
 - 35 out of 87 times in other positions (40%)
 - a total of 56 out of 118 (47%)
 Pots won at showdown - 5 of 12 (41%)
 Pots won without showdown - 8

delta: $1,475
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,485,614
balance: $7,842,567

Monday, January 27, 2014

Once more into the blue, dear friends

I'm back where I always want to be - on top of my poker world. I'm into the blue again, for the first time since November 13th. Next stop: 8 million play dollars. As soon as I hit that milestone, it's back to tournaments; I can hardly wait!

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 62 hands and saw flop:
 - 6 out of 7 times while in big blind (85%)
 - 5 out of 9 times while in small blind (55%)
 - 30 out of 46 times in other positions (65%)
 - a total of 41 out of 62 (66%)
 Pots won at showdown - 6 of 10 (60%)
 Pots won without showdown - 3

delta: $87,079
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,484,139
balance: $7,841,092

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Second best cash game month ever

I've started off my 2014 poker year with a bang. So far, I've had sixteen winning sessions and only one losing one. It's been a monster month. I've won a whopping $598,748, which makes this my second best cash game no limit hold'em month ever. If I could keep up this pace, I'd end up winning over 7 million play dollars in 2014. Is that realistic? Certainly not. Am I going to shoot for it? Most definitely! As Browning wrote,

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp,
Or what's a heaven for?


During current Hold'em session you were dealt 132 hands and saw flop:
 - 16 out of 17 times while in big blind (94%)
 - 12 out of 17 times while in small blind (70%)
 - 53 out of 98 times in other positions (54%)
 - a total of 81 out of 132 (61%)
 Pots won at showdown - 7 of 14 (50%)
 Pots won without showdown - 23

delta: $40,654
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,397,060
balance: $7,754,013

Friday, January 24, 2014

Pride and sorrow

Certain phrases have a way of staying in your memory. One such for me is "The Pride and Sorrow of Chess", which is what the great American chess player Paul Morphy came to be referred to as. Morphy was the pride of chess due to the brilliance of his games; he was the sorrow of chess because he quit playing and descended into reclusiveness and eccentricity. That a man can be both the pride and sorrow of something says a lot about the human condition. Pride and sorrow attach themselves in equal measure to just about every pursuit of man, including poker.

Last night, I had a pride and sorrow session. The pride lay in the fact that the sum of my winning hands was huge - $223,781. The sorrow was that the sum I lost on my losing hands was also huge - $219,958. That's the second largest amount I've ever lost in a winning session.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 61 hands and saw flop:
 - 6 out of 9 times while in big blind (66%)
 - 7 out of 10 times while in small blind (70%)
 - 26 out of 42 times in other positions (61%)
 - a total of 39 out of 61 (63%)
 Pots won at showdown - 7 of 11 (63%)
 Pots won without showdown - 2

delta: $3,823
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,356,406
balance: $7,713,359

Thursday, January 23, 2014

AKo is often a kayo

It's amazing how much statistics can reveal. I've known for a long time that my very worst hand is AJo (ace jack offsuit). I've toyed with the idea of never playing it again. What I've only more recently come to realize is how dramatically my predilection for flushes has affected my results with certain hands. The most egregious example of this is when I'm dealt a big slick. My results with AKs (ace king suited) are woeful - I've lost $111,830 with it. In sharp contrast, my results with AKo (ace king offsuit) are stellar - I've won $539,172 with it. That's a $651,002 swing. It's clear to me why this disparity exists - I grossly overvalue the fact that the cards are suited when I'm dealt AKs.

Last night, I was dealt AKo twice. The first time, I won a pot worth $50,250. The second time, I won $36,500. My biggest pot of the night came with another offsuit holding; on hand 71, I won a pot worth $97,350 with A8o (which turned into two pair, aces and eights).

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 73 hands and saw flop:
 - 7 out of 8 times while in big blind (87%)
 - 5 out of 10 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 29 out of 55 times in other positions (52%)
 - a total of 41 out of 73 (56%)
 Pots won at showdown - 3 of 7 (42%)
 Pots won without showdown - 4

delta: $44,168
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,352,583
balance: $7,709,536

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

These are the good old days

The first time I used this title for a post, it was June 1, 2011. Here's an excerpt of what I wrote then:

The title of this post comes from Carly Simon's classic song "Anticipation". It's how I feel about how I'm playing poker right now. I have a hunch (and you know how us poker players love our hunches :-) that I'm playing the best I'll ever play.

Judging purely based on session deltas, this hunch was wrong. I'm on a cash game hot streak right now which rivals any I've had before; I've won 13 of the last fourteen sessions. This fourteen session cash game stretch is my fifth best ever; here are the top 10:

$550,344 2011-12-09 2011-12-27 (13)
$523,178 2011-12-07 2011-12-22 (13)
$515,744 2011-12-08 2011-12-23 (13)
$511,557 2012-03-15 2012-03-29 (14)
$510,103 2014-01-02 2014-01-21 (13)
$496,621 2012-06-23 2012-07-07 (11)
$488,820 2011-12-03 2011-12-19 (13)
$488,631 2012-03-14 2012-03-27 (14)
$482,510 2012-03-08 2012-03-21 (14)
$482,028 2012-06-26 2012-07-24 (11)


It's nice to know it's always possible for the good old days to wend their way back into the present day again :-)

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 7 hands and saw flop:
 - 1 out of 1 times while in big blind (100%)
 - 1 out of 1 times while in small blind (100%)
 - 1 out of 5 times in other positions (20%)
 - a total of 3 out of 7 (42%)
 Pots won at showdown - 1 of 2 (50%)
 Pots won without showdown - 0

delta: $29,483
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,308,415
balance: $7,665,368

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Showdown perfection

The title of this post is yet another swallow returning to Capistrano; I've used it before. Showdown perfection means just what it says - never losing a showdown. I achieved it again last night. When you're really playing well, it's like you can see through the cards; you just know when it's no good going to showdown, so you don't. The poker skill I'm proudest of is this sixth sense. It's not always in full working order, but when it is, watch out!

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 61 hands and saw flop:
 - 5 out of 9 times while in big blind (55%)
 - 5 out of 9 times while in small blind (55%)
 - 21 out of 43 times in other positions (48%)
 - a total of 31 out of 61 (50%)
 Pots won at showdown - 6 of 6 (100%)
 Pots won without showdown - 4

delta: $103,419
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,278,932
balance: $7,635,885

Monday, January 20, 2014

Double stealth

It took me a long time to come up with an angle for tonight's post. The reason it took so long is that there was nothing very extraordinary about Saturday night's session. The best I could come up with was the fact that I had two stealth two pairs in a row, on hands 12 and 13. Neither hand went to showdown. I won $11,937 on the first one, and $16,474 on the second.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 41 hands and saw flop:
 - 3 out of 3 times while in big blind (100%)
 - 2 out of 6 times while in small blind (33%)
 - 18 out of 32 times in other positions (56%)
 - a total of 23 out of 41 (56%)
 Pots won at showdown - 3 of 4 (75%)
 Pots won without showdown - 5

delta: $26,025
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,175,513
balance: $7,532,466

Saturday, January 18, 2014

A birth as rare

From the first time I read it, I loved Andrew Marvell's poem "The Definition of Love". Here's how it begins:

My Love is of a birth as rare   
As 'tis for object strange and high:   
It was begotten by despair   
Upon Impossibility.


Poker has shown me some fascinatingly rare births. Last night, though my winning streak ended, I was consoled by the fact that I was witness to one of them. For three straight hands, I was dealt essentially the same hand. What I mean by this is that though it wasn't the exact same two cards each time, it was the same two cards when the order in which they were dealt is ignored and when suit is ignored except for whether or not the two cards share the same one. The three hands were:

Qd 2h
Qs 2d
2d Qh


The short version is that I was dealt Q2o (queen deuce offsuit) three times in a row. What are the odds of being dealt the same hand three times in a row? I'll tell you, grasshopper. 1 in 28,561. Pretty long odds. I decided to write a utility to discover how many times a three-peat like this has happened to me in my poker career. It turns out it's happened just three times. The first time, the hand was 93s (nine three suited). Guess what the hand was the second time? It was none other than Q2o. You just can't make this shit up :-)

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 124 hands and saw flop:
 - 14 out of 18 times while in big blind (77%)
 - 8 out of 16 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 41 out of 90 times in other positions (45%)
 - a total of 63 out of 124 (50%)
 Pots won at showdown - 3 of 15 (20%)
 Pots won without showdown - 14

delta: $-55,617
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,149,488
balance: $7,506,441

Friday, January 17, 2014

A feel game

Even though poker requires a thorough understanding of odds and probability, it's also undeniably a feel game. Sometimes, you feel the rhythm of the cards. Sometimes, the cards call to you. I love it when they do :-) Last night, the cards called to me on hand 25. I was dealt 6s 5s, and the flop came 8s As 9h. I didn't know if my flush was coming on the turn or the river; I only knew it was coming. It came on the river, as it turned out. How did I know? I can't explain, because I don't know myself. If I were able to explain, it wouldn't be a feel thing, and it is a feel thing. I'd much rather be able to hear the call of cards, though I can't explain how I hear it, than not to hear the call at all.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 26 hands and saw flop:
 - 3 out of 4 times while in big blind (75%)
 - 1 out of 4 times while in small blind (25%)
 - 8 out of 18 times in other positions (44%)
 - a total of 12 out of 26 (46%)
 Pots won at showdown - 1 of 4 (25%)
 Pots won without showdown - 2

delta: $29,259
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,205,105
balance: $7,562,058

Thursday, January 16, 2014

My favorite type of hand

Another swallow has returned to Capistrano; I'm reusing a blog post title again. If you've been a faithful reader of this blog, you already know what my favorite type of hand is, but for you faithless ones, I'll reiterate. My favorite type of hand is a flush. That might not seem to make a whole lot of sense. In fact, it might not make a whole lot of sense. Most players would probably pick a full house as their favorite. Four of a kinds and straight flushes are just too rare to really be in the running for a favorite type of hand. Full houses happen much more often, and win the vast majority of the time. However, from the beginning, I've always loved flushes. There's something so perfect about them! They're the most orderly of the not-astronomically-rare hands. From an orderliness perspective, four of a kinds are ugly - that fifth card sticks out like a sore thumb. Full houses are orderliness-impaired also - the three of a kind and the pair are forever out of balance. Flushes, however, couldn't get much more orderly. That's what makes them so beautiful to me, and why I prize them so much.

Last night, on hand 55, I won a pot worth $90,673 with a king high flush. I hit it on the turn - my favorite flush street. I called it a night the very next hand.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 56 hands and saw flop:
 - 6 out of 7 times while in big blind (85%)
 - 4 out of 7 times while in small blind (57%)
 - 23 out of 42 times in other positions (54%)
 - a total of 33 out of 56 (58%)
 Pots won at showdown - 4 of 7 (57%)
 Pots won without showdown - 3

delta: $40,673
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,175,846
balance: $7,532,799

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Sweet sixteen

There are certain blog post titles I keep coming back to, like a swallow to Capistrano. They're just too good not to reuse. The title of this post is no exception. What do I mean by sweet sixteen this time? It's the agoal value I achieved last night. As a refresher, agoal is the average gain of the winning hands divided by the average loss of the losing hands. I've come to the conclusion that an agoal value of 10 or above is an excellent indicator of a winning session. Here are the numbers from last night:

    134898 total_winning_delta
         5 num_winning_hands
  26979.60 avg_gain

     51350 total_losing_delta
        31 num_losing_hands
   1656.45 avg_loss

     16.29 agoal


During current Hold'em session you were dealt 49 hands and saw flop:
 - 3 out of 5 times while in big blind (60%)
 - 3 out of 6 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 21 out of 38 times in other positions (55%)
 - a total of 27 out of 49 (55%)
 Pots won at showdown - 5 of 7 (71%)
 Pots won without showdown - 0

delta: $83,548
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,135,173
balance: $7,492,126

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

A week by the lake

I measure poker time in sessions, not days. A week in poker time is seven sessions, however spread out they are in real time. When I started playing online poker, I was almost as likely not to play each night as I was likely to. That's a rather confusing way of saying I played about every other night. Nowadays, I'm much more likely to play than not. Where am I going with this? Merely to observe that over the course of time, poker time for me has approached nearer and nearer to real time. A poker week in the early days might have taken a fortnight, whereas now it rarely takes longer than 8 or 9 days.

I've come up with a gold standard for a successful poker week. If I can win a quarter of a million play dollars in seven sessions, I know I'm really on my game. I call such a week "a week by the lake". I came up with the phrase by morphing the title of a book by H.E. Bates, changing the time period from a month to a week. However long you stay by a lake, it's damned relaxing :-)

Friday night marked my latest week by the lake.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 108 hands and saw flop:
 - 9 out of 16 times while in big blind (56%)
 - 8 out of 15 times while in small blind (53%)
 - 46 out of 77 times in other positions (59%)
 - a total of 63 out of 108 (58%)
 Pots won at showdown - 8 of 14 (57%)
 Pots won without showdown - 8

delta: $30,407
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,051,625
balance: $7,408,578

Friday, January 10, 2014

One Hand to rule them all

Looking at the bar chart of my stack size over the course of last night's session, one hand stands head and shoulders above the rest. On hand 102, I won a pot worth $66,939, $41,126 of which was other people's money. The next largest positive delta clocked in at a mere $10,302. That means that the ratio of the largest positive delta to the next largest was 3.99. Just for fun, I wrote a utility to calculate this ratio for every cash game no limit hold'em session, then sort the results in descending order. The 3.99 I hit last night only makes it to number 88 on the resulting list; the top dog is a whopping 68.00, which I achieved on February 25th, 2012.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 103 hands and saw flop:
 - 13 out of 14 times while in big blind (92%)
 - 7 out of 14 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 33 out of 75 times in other positions (44%)
 - a total of 53 out of 103 (51%)
 Pots won at showdown - 5 of 10 (50%)
 Pots won without showdown - 9

delta: $46,361
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $5,021,218
balance: $7,378,171

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Shot from guns

An incontrovertible proof of my advancing age, aside from more wrinkles and more gray hair, is the fact that as time goes by, I'm in an ever diminishing pool of people who can remember advertising slogans from sufficiently long ago. One which sticks in my mind is "Shot from guns". This was an ad campaign for a cereal. I confess I had to google the slogan just now to make sure I got the brand right; it was Quaker Puffed Rice.

Can the slogan be applied to poker? Easily. It means that it's a good thing to come out of the starting gate quickly, and win the very first hand of the session. If you can do that, you get a jump start on a winning session. Last night, I was shot from guns. As it turned out, I was never underwater. I just did some research and discovered the following:

- I've played 573 sessions of cash game no limit hold'em poker
- in 120 of them, I won the first hand, for an average of .209424; that's well above the expected average of 1 in 7 (since I invariably join tables with 6 players seated at them), or .142857
- of those 120 shot from guns sessions, I've won 92, for an average of .766667
- of the remaining 453 sessions, I've won 297, for an average of .655629

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 23 hands and saw flop:
 - 2 out of 4 times while in big blind (50%)
 - 1 out of 2 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 8 out of 17 times in other positions (47%)
 - a total of 11 out of 23 (47%)
 Pots won at showdown - 2 of 3 (66%)
 Pots won without showdown - 2

delta: $10,134
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,974,857
balance: $7,331,810

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

High floptane

The higher the octane of gasoline, the more power is delivered when it is combusted. The more flops you see in poker, the better your chances of flopping a hand which can power your stack into the stratosphere. I call sessions where you have a high seeing-the-flop percentage high floptane ones. Last night, by any standard, I had a high floptane session. I saw the flop 77% of the time. That turns out to be my eighth highest floptane ever for a winning session of at least 50 hands.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 57 hands and saw flop:
 - 10 out of 12 times while in big blind (83%)
 - 7 out of 11 times while in small blind (63%)
 - 27 out of 34 times in other positions (79%)
 - a total of 44 out of 57 (77%)
 Pots won at showdown - 5 of 10 (50%)
 Pots won without showdown - 7

delta: $28,593
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,964,723
balance: $7,321,676

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

The land of the fours

Last night, I won my third session in a row. Sad to say, that's a pretty big deal these days :-) It's been almost a month since the last time I accomplished that. One good thing about my extended slump is that it's totally changed my attitude toward profit-taking. Now, whenever I achieve a profit of $10,000 or more, I'll have no compunction about quitting early. That's what I did last night, after only 9 hands. Since I won 4 of them, my winning average was .444444..., aka the land of the fours :-)

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 9 hands and saw flop:
 - 1 out of 1 times while in big blind (100%)
 - 0 out of 2 times while in small blind (0%)
 - 4 out of 6 times in other positions (66%)
 - a total of 5 out of 9 (55%)
 Pots won at showdown - 2 of 2 (100%)
 Pots won without showdown - 2

delta: $26,090
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,936,130
balance: $7,293,083

Monday, January 6, 2014

Teenagers

It's funny how often the things you know must be true turn out not to be true at all. Case in point: teenagers. That's my slang for sessions which are 13 to 19 hands in length. Before looking at the numbers, I knew what I would find - that the vast majority of teenagers would be winning ones, and that the sum of the deltas of the winning teenagers would dwarf the absolute value of the sum of the deltas of the losing teenagers. I was wrong on both counts. Here are the cold hard facts:

- of 64 teenagers, a slim majority of 33 were winning ones
- sum of winning teenagers: $1,059,117
- sum of losing teenagers: $-1,751,600

On Friday night, I had my second winning teenager in a row. I'm aiming for no more than 30 hands tonight.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 14 hands and saw flop:
 - 2 out of 2 times while in big blind (100%)
 - 1 out of 1 times while in small blind (100%)
 - 4 out of 11 times in other positions (36%)
 - a total of 7 out of 14 (50%)
 Pots won at showdown - 4 of 4 (100%)
 Pots won without showdown - 1

delta: $64,272
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,910,040
balance: $7,266,993

Friday, January 3, 2014

7 1/2

If I'm remembering correctly, Fellini's film "8 1/2" was so named because he made it in between his eighth and ninth movies, as a sort of unforeseen in-between movie. I've always liked the title, so I thought I'd steal a little of its panache when it came time to dream up a title for this post. What am I referring to here? The number of big blinds I lost last night. Other than the unusually small size of the losses, the really interesting thing was that each big blind, and the half big blind, were all lost on separate hands. Of course, that means that the most I ever lost an a single hand was one big blind. I'll go out on a limb and claim that this is the first time such a thing has ever happened to me. I'll check it out soon, and 'fess up if I'm wrong.

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 13 hands and saw flop:
 - 1 out of 2 times while in big blind (50%)
 - 1 out of 2 times while in small blind (50%)
 - 6 out of 9 times in other positions (66%)
 - a total of 8 out of 13 (61%)
 Pots won at showdown - 1 of 1 (100%)
 Pots won without showdown - 2

delta: $47,456
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,845,768
balance: $7,202,721

Thursday, January 2, 2014

My 2013 poker year by the numbers

On New Year's Eve, I had another losing session. Here's a look back at 2013, poker-wise:

      311 sessions

   23,932 hands
   13,750 flops seen
  57.4545 flops seen percentage

    3,651 showdowns
    1,823 pots won at showdown
  49.9315 pots won at showdown percentage

    1,955 pots won without showdown

 $108,809 January
 $275,758 February
 $294,748 March
 $305,529 April
 $-59,384 May
$-110,262 June
  $-4,258 July
  $90,249 August
 $124,364 September
 $401,667 October
$-271,740 November
$-379,517 December
=========
 $775,963


 $140,537 largest single session net gain (03/03)
 $230,261 largest single session net loss (06/13)
 $121,394 largest single hand net gain (hand 78 on 10/18)
  $97,932 largest single hand net loss (hand 53 on 06/13)

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 98 hands and saw flop:
 - 14 out of 15 times while in big blind (93%)
 - 9 out of 14 times while in small blind (64%)
 - 36 out of 69 times in other positions (52%)
 - a total of 59 out of 98 (60%)
 Pots won at showdown - 2 of 8 (25%)
 Pots won without showdown - 5

delta: $-48,467
cash game no limit hold'em balance: $4,798,312
balance: $7,155,265