Poker interruptus

I've used this title several times before. Last night, I experienced poker interruptus once again. It's never fun. This time, instead of being due to a power outage, it was due to my internet connection going down.

This is an excerpt from my January 24, 2019 post. Yesterday, in the only tournament I played, my internet connection went down after I'd already made the money. It happened in the middle of a hand where I'd been dealt pocket cowboys, and called a preflop bet which put me all in. I never got to see if I won that hand or not. I'm guessing not, for one of the following reasons:

1. there were additional bets made after my connection dropped, which would have caused the PokerStars software to change my status to "sitting out", mucking my hand automatically

2. I think the PokerStars software may have changed my status to "sitting out" even if no additional bets were made, due to detecting that my connection had dropped

Fortunately, these "poker interruptus" occurrences are exceedingly rare.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     310   81    45   122000    48

delta: $72,000
2025 balance: $-961,000
2025 blue distance: $961,000
balance: $15,336,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.43 (1308 of 3157)

The hateful eight

I've never seen Quentin Tarantino's "The Hateful Eight", but that won't stop me from appropriating its title, yet again :-) In this case, the hateful eight are the eight hands I played in the first tournament I entered yesterday. It was the smallest number of hands I've played in a tournament since I started manually recording the minimum viable hand data. One again, I was dealt baby cowboys on my last hand, and they rode off into the sunset. I fared much better in yesterday's second tournament, making the money. It was only a min cash, but beggars can't be choosy :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       ?    ?     ?        0     8
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     364   99    97    64000    29

delta: $-36,000
2025 balance: $-1,033,000
2025 blue distance: $1,033,000
balance: $15,264,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.41 (1307 of 3156)

Baby cowboys into the sunset

"Baby cowboys" is my nickname for pocket jacks. Last night, my baby cowboys rode off into the sunset. Although that makes for a good movie ending, it's not what you're hoping for when playing poker.

This is an excerpt from my April 4, 2022 post. In the one tournament I played yesterday, I only lasted 10 hands. I had one premium hand dealt to me, baby cowboys. Unfortunately for me, it was on the tenth hand. Whatcha gonna do?

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     248   63   137        0    10

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-997,000
2025 blue distance: $997,000
balance: $15,300,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.41 (1306 of 3154)

Further refinement of the magic minimum

It's a given that the more hands you play in a tournament, the better your chances are of making the money. It would be neat if there were a magic number of hands which, if you managed to achieve it, would guarantee that you made the money. Of course, there's no such number ...

This is an excerpt from my February 13, 2025 post. I call this number the magic minimum. While it's true that there's no such number in perpetuity, it's also true that at any particular point in time, there is such a number, even though its usefulness is limited, since it only applies to past data, and won't necessarily be true for future data. Over time, the magic minimum will gradually increase; it can never decrease. Here's the definition of the magic minimum: find the maximum number of hands played in the tournaments where you failed to make the money, and add 1 :-) Currently, based on the hand data I've collected so far, the magic minimum is 35.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     394   99   154        0    16

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-947,000
2025 blue distance: $947,000
balance: $15,350,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.42 (1306 of 3153)

Profitable and unprofitable months

One month is a good length of time for an observation window. I've now played online poker in 190 distinct months. 122 of them were profitable. This year, although I'm still in the red, at least I'm trending upwards. No matter what happens in today's session, this month will still be a profitable one :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     340   81    96        0    34
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     322   81   119        0    25

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-897,000
2025 blue distance: $897,000
balance: $15,400,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.43 (1306 of 3152)

Three call ins and a fall in

It's rare for me to go all in to open the betting on a street. When all my chips go into the middle, the most common reason is that I called a bet that was at least as big as my chip stack; that's what I call a "call in".  It's also rare for me to allow my stack to get so short that it gets eaten up by the forced bets before the hole cards are even dealt, with no volition on my part; that's what I call a "fall in". Last night, I had three call ins and a fall in. I was lucky enough to survive the fall in and the first two call ins. That helped me last long enough to reach the fifth money jump above a min cash.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     309   81    31   135000    52

delta: $85,000
2025 balance: $-797,000
2025 blue distance: $797,000
balance: $15,500,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.46 (1306 of 3150)

KK KO'd

I have enough hand data now to notice some anomalies. One of the glaring ones is my winning percentage with cowboys (pocket kings). It's  as low as it can possibly be. I've received them 3 times in 827 hands, and have lost at showdown each time. Let's just say my cowboys are getting KO'd. In other news, I failed to complete a turducken on Sunday. Time to start a new streak :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     471  117   145        0    22

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-882,000
2025 blue distance: $882,000
balance: $15,415,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.44 (1305 of 3149)

Looking for a turducken

On Friday, I completed my first hambone of the year. My streak of consecutive in the money finishes is now at four, and still alive. If I finish in the money in the first tournament I play today, the streak will improve to five, and still be alive. I've decided to call such a streak a turducken, since it's two better than a turkey :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     237   63    42    99000    38

delta: $49,000
2025 balance: $-832,000
2025 blue distance: $832,000
balance: $15,465,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.45 (1305 of 3148)

Looking for a hambone

I love poker slang, and slang in general. It's fun to create new poker slang, and also fun to borrow known slang terms from non-poker contexts and use them in a poker context. In bowling, three consecutive strikes is a turkey. In poker, I define a turkey to be three consecutive tournaments where I finish in the money. Yesterday, I completed my third turkey of the year. In bowling, four consecutive strikes is a hambone. If I finish in the money in the first tournament I play today, I'll complete my first hambone of the year :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     313   81    79    68000    28
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     340   81    73    74000    30

delta: $42,000
2025 balance: $-881,000
2025 blue distance: $881,000
balance: $15,416,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.44 (1304 of 3147)

Under the lights

Yesterday I had a nice rebound from the session before. I got under the lights (i.e., made it to the final table) for the second time this year. That extrapolates to 14 times for the year, which is on a par with what I had in 2023 and 2024. Getting under the lights never gets old :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     211   54     9   194000    60

delta: $144,000
2025 balance: $-923,000
2025 blue distance: $923,000
balance: $15,374,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.40 (1302 of 3145)

None and done

On Tuesday I played three tournaments, and missed the money by a country mile in all of them. Not only that, they were three of the shortest tournaments I've played in recent memory. To top it all off, I failed to win a single pot in the shortest of the three. That's only the second time that's happened in the 22 tournaments I've played since I started manually recording the minimum viable poker hand data. I call that a none and done tournament :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     249   63   136        0    12
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     325   81   137        0    15
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     259   72   125        0     9

delta: $-150,000
2025 balance: $-1,067,000
2025 blue distance: $1,067,000
balance: $15,230,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.38 (1301 of 3144)

Lion or lamb

When a tournament approaches the money bubble, every remaining player must decide if they want to play like a lion or play like a lamb. Lions are going for the money up top; lambs are just going for a min cash. Interestingly, there's no hard and fast answer to the problem of how one should play. Many times, I'm content to be a lamb, and try to fold my way into the money. However, many other times I insist on being a lion ...

This is an excerpt from my July 20, 2020 post. In the final hand of yesterday's session, I insisted on being a lion. I'd been dealt 97o (nine seven offsuit), and an eight and a ten showed up in the flop, giving me an open-ended straight draw. All my chips went into the middle, but I bricked on the turn and the river, and missed the money by four spots. Still and all, I have no regrets.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     375   99    61   112000    39
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     205   54    58        0    25

delta: $12,000
2025 balance: $-917,000
2025 blue distance: $917,000
balance: $15,380,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.42 (1301 of 3141)

The chicken or the egg?

There are 1,326 possible starting hands in Texas Hold'em, 60 of which are premium ones. That means that players can expect to be dealt a premium hand roughly once every 22 hands. Of course, premium hands don't always come smoothly, but over time, they achieve this ratio. Looking at the hand data I've collected so far, I can see that it's difficult to make the money if you aren't dealt a single premium hand in the course of a tournament. Of the four tournaments where this has happened to me, I only made the money in one. There's more than one way to look at this, however. It could certainly be the case that the lack of premium hands played a large part in my missing the money. On the other hand, it could also be the case that missing the money played a large part in my not receiving premium hands, since missing the money means I played fewer hands than I would have otherwise, and the fewer hands that are played, the greater the chances of not receiving a single premium hand. This a variation on the old conundrum "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?". Be that as it may, whichever came first, it makes no difference to the bottom line :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     428  117   178        0    17

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-929,000
2025 blue distance: $929,000
balance: $15,368,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.41 (1300 of 3139)

A folding machine

I played three tournaments yesterday, and made the money in the third one. Interestingly, that was the only one where I didn't get dealt a premium hand. In fact, most of the hands I was dealt that tournament were crap. That led to my setting a new record for percentage of hands I folded before the flop - over 91. I was a folding machine, but was able to min cash nonetheless.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     422   99   118        0    23
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     338   81   120        0    24
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     322   81    75    70000    34

delta: $-80,000
2025 balance: $-879,000
2025 blue distance: $879,000
balance: $15,418,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.43 (1300 of 3138)

Rockets into the sunset

It always hurts when you've been dealt pocket aces and they get cracked. It hurts even more when you get bounced out of a tournament that way. That's what happened to me yesterday, on the final hand of the second tournament I played. I used to call that occurrence "aces out", but now I call it "rockets into the sunset". When the poker gods see fit to send your rockets into the sunset, you know it's time to quit playing for the rest of the day.

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     265   72    92        0    30
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     406   99   153        0    17

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-799,000
2025 blue distance: $799,000
balance: $15,498,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.44 (1299 of 3135)

Refining a magic minimum

Two posts ago, I stated that my magic minimum number of hands to play to virtually assure me of making the money is forty. It turns out I was a little bit off. I now believe this magic number is actually 35. Since I started manually recording hand data, I've played in 11 tournaments, making the money in five of them. In all of those five, I played at least 35 hands. In all six of the tournaments where I missed the money, I played at most 27 hands. If the maximum number of hands I've played in tournaments where I missed the money stays below the minimum number of hands I've played in tournaments where I made the money, that minimum number will truly be magic :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry entries paid place winnings hands

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000     320   81    95        0    27

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-699,000
2025 blue distance: $699,000
balance: $15,598,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.46 (1299 of 3133)

A tale of two pocks

In the one tournament I played yesterday, I was dealt pocks twice when the money bubble was about to burst. On hand 28, I was dealt cowboys (pocket kings), went all in with them, and was a heavy favorite; however, the river did me in. The only thing that prevented me from hitting the rail was the fact that I had more chips at the start of the hand than the opponent who called me had. On hand 34, I was dealt pocket threes and was so short-stacked I fell in. Mercifully, my threes held up, and that enabled me to make the money. The cowboys should have won, and the threes should have lost, but I'm not complaining. That's just how poker rolls :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     189   54    49    74000

delta: $24,000
2025 balance: $-649,000
2025 blue distance: $649,000
balance: $15,648,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.48 (1299 of 3132)

North of forty

It's a given that the more hands you play in a tournament, the better your chances are of making the money. It would be neat if there were a magic number of hands which, if you managed to achieve it, would guarantee that you made the money. Of course, there's no such number, but my poker data indicates that there is a number which gives you a high probability of making the money, even though it isn't guaranteed. For the MTTs I play, and the way I play them, that number is forty. Since I started manually recording poker hand data, I've played forty or more hands in three of the nine tournaments I've played, and made the money in all three. For the record, I played 86 hands in Tuesday's tournament. It's good to be north of forty :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     343   81     5   505000

delta: $455,000
2025 balance: $-673,000
2025 blue distance: $673,000
balance: $15,624,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.46 (1298 of 3131)

A rare breed of hand

I haven't played any poker since last Friday. In the meantime, though, I've written some additional utilities to examine my minimum viable poker hand data in various ways. In the course of doing this, I became reacquainted with a rare breed of hand. It has the following distinguishing characteristics:

- I didn't fold before the flop

- I didn't see the flop

- I won the hand without a showdown

Actually, the third characteristic is guaranteed to be true if the first two are true, but I'm including it for completeness. There's only one scenario which allows all three characteristics to be true:

- I'm in the big blind

- every other player at the table folds before the flop

In the hand data I've collected so far, I've been the beneficiary of this rare breed of hand four times; in every case, it appeared after the money bubble had burst.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     309   81    19   149000

delta: $99,000
2025 balance: $-1,128,000
2025 blue distance: $1,128,000
balance: $15,169,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.44 (1297 of 3130)

A hole in my data

I've been looking at my premium hand stats, and they're not stellar. In the seven tournaments where I've manually recorded hand data, I've been dealt premium hands ten times. Since I was dealt a total of 193 hands, I've been getting premium hands at a 5.18% clip. That's higher than the expected 4.52%, so I have no complaints there. The problem is my win rate; I've won just three of the hands, and lost seven. I realize there's a hole in my data; I'm only recording folds which came before the flop or on the river. It's important to record folds which came on the flop or on the turn also. Of the seven hands I lost, I lost one at showdown and folded the rest. Of the six I folded, I only know at what point the fold occurred in one case, when I folded to a river bet. In the other five hands, I either folded on the flop or on the turn, but have no way of knowing which. That just won't do. I'll remedy that, going forward, by taking the little bit of extra time I'll need to record the additional data. Note: the stats below are from Wednesday's session; I didn't play yesterday.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     251   63   117        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     407   99   135        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     321   81   120        0

delta: $-150,000
2025 balance: $-1,227,000
2025 blue distance: $1,227,000
balance: $15,070,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.42 (1296 of 3129)

One showdown

Every poker player in any tournament ever is always guaranteed to go to showdown at least once, that time being when his/her final hand is played. It's a very bad thing if that's the only time you go to showdown, since that guarantees you missed the money. In the one tournament I played yesterday, that's exactly what happened to me. I played just 16 hands, and folded before the flop on all but two of them. The first time time I paid to see the flop was on hand five, when I'd been dealt a big slick. I got to see all of the community cards, but had to fold to a big bet on the river, so I didn't go to showdown. The second time I paid to see the flop was on my final hand. I was short-stacked, and called a bet which put me all in. That was the only time I went to showdown. For the record, my final holding was K2o (king deuce offsuit).

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     294   72   112        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-1,077,000
2025 blue distance: $1,077,000
balance: $15,220,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.46 (1296 of 3126)

Quick is sick

In yesterday's session, I registered my second straight money finish of the three tournaments during which I recorded my minimum viable poker hand data. I think the benefits of recording this data include being forced to make poker decisions more quickly than I normally would. There's an old poker adage which says "Long is wrong", meaning the longer you take to make a decision, the better the chances are you'll make the wrong one. A corollary to this adage might be "Quick is sick", meaning the quicker you make a decision, the better the chances are you'll make the right one. Of course, in this context, sick is slang, and means awesome :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     358   99    67    96000

delta: $46,000
2025 balance: $-1,027,000
2025 blue distance: $1,027,000
balance: $15,270,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.47 (1296 of 3125)

A good start to February

Yesterday, my first session in February was a success. I had the best finish of the year so far in an MTT NLHE. I'm happy that my dismal poker January is in the rear view mirror! In other news, I was able to record my minimum viable poker hand data without difficulty. Here are some details which stand out from the tournament where I had the best finish:

- I was dealt 73 hands

- I folded before the flop 51 times (69.86% of the time)

- I went to showdown 8 times, winning 7 times (87.5%)

- I won without showdown 6 times

- I was dealt premium hands 5 times

I'm psyched to have this data, and will continue to collect it.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     356   99   166        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     369   99    10   211000

delta: $111,000
2025 balance: $-1,073,000
2025 blue distance: $1,073,000
balance: $15,224,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.45 (1295 of 3124)

Minimum viable poker hand data

In the world of software development, one of the current buzz phrases is "minimum viable product". The idea is that in order to be able to launch quickly, the first version of a product should contain the smallest amount of functionality that might actually be useful.

This is an excerpt from my March 12, 2012 post. I've been missing automated poker hand histories for so long, I've decided it's time to bite the bullet and record some of the hand data manually. Since it won't be possible to record every detail manually, I need to decide what the minimum viable poker hand data are for me. Of course, I need to record my hole cards for every hand I've been dealt; that's a given. It's also imperative for me to record whether I won the hand or not. Other than these two vital details, I need to figure out what other data I might want, using a cost benefit analysis. The cost is the time and effort it would take to record each additional datum, and the benefit is whether having the datum will be able to help me improve my game. I'll give the following a shot:

1. my hole cards

2. whether I saw the flop

3. whether the hand was an all in, a call in, a fall in, or none of these

4. whether I won the hand

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     346   81   149        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-1,184,000
2025 blue distance: $1,184,000
balance: $15,113,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.45 (1294 of 3122)

The streak is dead

Before yesterday's session, I had a streak of making it to Station 2 13 straight times. As a reminder, Station 2 is when you outlast at least half of the field in an MTT. The streak ended yesterday. My downfall was another failure of heart in the one tournament I entered. I need to get my mojo back.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     307   81   176        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-1,134,000
2025 blue distance: $1,134,000
balance: $15,163,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.46 (1294 of 3121)

A failure of heart

I only played one tournament yesterday. The most memorable hand was one I'm not particularly proud of. I was dealt a big slick, and was up against two opponents. I bailed on the turn when the board paired, and one of my opponents put in a sizable bet. I figured I was up against either two pairs or trips, so I folded. Both opponents went to showdown. The pot was won by the opponent who had an ace kicker to go with the board's pair. Had I not bailed, I would have won the pot, since my king would have kicked his other hole card. The only scenario where my folding on the turn would have made sense was if an opponent had bet big enough to put me all in if I called, and that hadn't been the case. I realized I'd demonstrated a failure of heart, which is a sin against poker. I got my just reward, being bounced out of the tournament shortly afterwards.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     366   99   134        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-1,084,000
2025 blue distance: $1,084,000
balance: $15,213,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.47 (1294 of 3120)

My second worst poker January

My worst poker January came in 2022, when I lost just over three million play dollars. With only three sessions left in this January, it's highly probable that it will remain my second worst one. The most memorable hand of yesterday's session was the one that bounced me out of the first tournament I entered. I hit the rail with pocket tens, so it was both a poxit and a prexit.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     445  117   161        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     349   81   170        0

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-1,034,000
2025 blue distance: $1,034,000
balance: $15,263,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.49 (1294 of 3119)

Jump streak

As I've mentioned before, when no detail from a particular session stands out, in order to produce a halfway interesting post, I must resort to widening the scope of my focus to recent trends. It took me a while, but I finally found a trend I could talk about in this post. Including yesterday's session, the last nine times I've made the money, I've cashed at least one money jump up from a min cash. Not much to crow about, but beggars can't be choosy :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     395   99   149        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     310   81    51   109000

delta: $9,000
2025 balance: $-934,000
2025 blue distance: $934,000
balance: $15,363,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.51 (1294 of 3117)

Nothing to complain about

If there's one thing I've learned in all my years of playing poker, it's that you should never complain. Certainly, there will be times when you'll feel hard done by the poker gods. The thing to keep in mind is that it's much easier to remember bad luck than it is to remember good luck. It's all too easy to treat good luck as if it's skill. If you're really honest with yourself, you only ever get into a position to complain heartily about bad luck after you've already been the beneficiary of a lot of good luck.

This is an excerpt from my February 11, 2017 post. In the last tournament I played yesterday, some tremendously bad luck prevented me from making the money. However, the bad luck was only possible due to the tremendously good luck I'd been the recipient of earlier. Here are the details:

The good luck: when I was severely short-stacked and in the big blind, the forced bet caused me to "fall in". Miraculously, every other player at the table folded, so I won the antes and the small blind, and was still alive. The most incredible part of this good luck was that the player in the small blind had a better than average stack, and only needed to call with a very small percentage of his/her remaining chips in order to put me at risk for my tournament life. 99.9% of poker players would call in this scenario. I would call in this scenario every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.

The bad luck: on my final hand of the session, I was dealt a big slick, and shoved. I got one caller, who turned over another big slick. My opponent's big slick was better, since it was suited (hearts) and nine wasn't. I would chop the pot if I could just fade my opponent making a heart flush. I had a 90.67% chance of chopping the pot and a 2.17% chance of actually winning it, meaning I had just a 7.16% chance of losing it. However, lose it I did, when my opponent spiked a heart flush on the river. Had I chopped the pot, I would have made the money.

I'm not complaining, since I have nothing to complain about. That's just poker, and I'm totally fine with it :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     323   81    32   142000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     392   99   163        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     339   81    84        0

delta: $-8,000
2025 balance: $-943,000
2025 blue distance: $943,000
balance: $15,354,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.51 (1293 of 3115)

Money jumps

The title of this post is deliberately ambiguous. Is "jumps" a plural noun, or a verb? Actually it's both :-) The way all MTT payouts are structured, the gaps between the payout levels dramatically increase as you head from the bottom to the top; moreover, the number of paid places at each payout level decreases, until you reach the final table, where just one place is paid per level. Therefore, the higher up the ladder you go, the bigger the money jumps (a plural noun here) get. Also, the more the money jumps (a verb here) around from stack to stack.

This is an excerpt from my October 21, 2016 post. In yesterday's session, I made the money in both tournaments I entered. Not only that, I made multiple money jumps in each. In the first, I moved up the ladder five times; in the second, three times. I'm happy to be out of my slump, at least for the time being :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     326   81    28   143000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     272   72    39   113000

delta: $156,000
2025 balance: $-935,000
2025 blue distance: $935,000
balance: $15,362,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.52 (1292 of 3112)

Two memorable hands

Two hands stand out from yesterday's session. I don't remember which came first, and also don't remember which tournament either came from. I simply remember their outcomes, and how they made me feel. I won one hand, and lost the other. In the hand I won, I was short-stacked and went all in with Q9o (queen nine offsuit). Four of us went to showdown, and I won the main pot with a queen high. That meant none of us had been dealt a pair, none of us had paired the board, and none of my opponents had better than a jack high. The odds of that happening are tiny indeed, and I felt extremely lucky. In the hand I lost, I flopped top pair with a good kicker, and was the only one to call a bet made by a player acting before me. The turn put a third diamond on the board and we both checked. The river was a blank, my opponent went all in, and I called. I lost to a diamond flush my opponent had made on the turn. My stack was suddenly on life support, and I felt schooled.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     271   72    58    89000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     349   81   144        0

delta: $-11,000
2025 balance: $-1,091,000
2025 blue distance: $1,091,000
balance: $15,206,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.48 (1290 of 3110)

In a slump

One of the facts of life for a poker player is that you're going to go through slumps. They're unavoidable. Though you don't have a choice about going through them, you do have a choice about what your attitude is going to be. The best thing about slumps is that they're survivable. The more slumps you survive, the better you'll be able to adopt a philosophical attitude toward them, and the better you'll be able to survive future slumps.

This is an excerpt from my May 27, 2013 post. I'm definitely in a slump. I've survived every slump before, so this one should be no different.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     434  117    51   127000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     361   99   152        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     307   81   158        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     289   72   126        0

delta: $-73,000
2025 balance: $-1,080,000
2025 blue distance: $1,080,000
balance: $15,217,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.47 (1289 of 3108)

Stopping the bitch

Yesterday, I finally had a winning session, stopping a nine session losing streak. I only made a small profit, but I'll take it. In other news, I achieved a dubious personal "best" - the smallest number of hands played in a tournament where I recorded an official place. That number, of course, would be one. I joined yesterday's final tournament during the break at the end of the late registration period, which meant I'd get an official place no matter what. I was dealt pocket rockets on my first hand, shoved preflop, and got one caller. My opponent had been dealt AJo (ace jack offsuit), so I was a 91.1% favorite to win the hand. However, my opponent spiked a queen on the river to make Broadway, and I was gone in a New York minute.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     352   99   104        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     475  117    38   154000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     359   99   240        0

delta: $4,000
2025 balance: $-1,007,000
2025 blue distance: $1,007,000
balance: $15,290,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.49 (1288 of 3104)

I hope I shall arrive soon

As of this morning, I've played 20 poker sessions in 2025, and have been underwater the whole time. I hope I shall arrive above water soon :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     373   99   143        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     261   72   127        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     450  117   143        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     342   81    17   180000

delta: $-20,000
2025 balance: $-1,011,000
2025 blue distance: $1,011,000
balance: $15,286,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.50 (1287 of 3101)

The bloom is off the Limit rose

Playing limit poker is not working out the way I'd hoped, so I'm going to return to playing MTT NLHEs exclusively. Here are the reasons why limit tournaments are not for me:

- they attract fewer players, so the prize pools are smaller

- they require you to outlast a bigger percentage of the field in order to make the money

- sometimes their min cash payouts don't cover the buy in and entry fee

- their late registration periods are too long, making for higher variance 

- the caliber of player in limit tournaments is higher than it is in MTT NLHEs

- I'm simply not as good at limit poker as I am at no limit

Limit poker was fun while it lasted, but I'm over it now.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     307   81   150        0
MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6      65   12     0        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     309   81    69    81000
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8      78   16     0        0

delta: $-69,000
2025 balance: $-991,000
2025 blue distance: $991,000
balance: $15,306,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.52 (1286 of 3097)

You just can't make this shit up

I really enjoy it when I see something monstrously improbable happen at the poker table, even when it's to my detriment. Here are all the improbable things which happened in a hand from the first tournament of yesterday's session, which was MTT Limit Triple Draw 2-7 Lowball:

- on my third draw, I made a 7 6 5 3 2 low, which is the third best low hand

- I lost to a 7 6 4 3 2 low, which is the second best low hand

- it was my first (and last) hand of the tournament

You just can't make this shit up :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6      97   18     0        0
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8      83   16    62        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-922,000
2025 blue distance: $922,000
balance: $15,375,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.41 (1414 of 3499)

Runner runnered

There was a time, about 6 years or so ago, when I didn't believe there was such a thing as a bad beat. Silly me :-) Not only is there such a thing, but there's a whole menagerie of them; some are much worse than others. Perhaps the very worst of the lot is the runner runner.

This is an excerpt from my June 30, 2016 post. I was runner runnered on the final hand of the final tournament I played yesterday. I was short-stacked, and shoved preflop with a pair of sevens. I flopped a set, and was in great shape to win the main pot, as the flop was a rainbow with no pairs. The third card of the flop happened to be a diamond. The turn and the river were both diamonds, and I lost to a diamond flush. Whatcha gonna do?

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6      60   12     0        0
MTT   Stud       22000   3000       8     139   32    19    30000
MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      89   24    31        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     335   81   152        0

delta: $-95,000
2025 balance: $-872,000
2025 blue distance: $872,000
balance: $15,425,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.43 (1414 of 3497)

An emerging favorite

It's early on in my return to playing limit poker, but already, a favorite variant is emerging - Razz. For me, Razz has the best mixture of being fun to play and also rewarding of skill. Deuce is the most fun to play, but has the highest variance.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      49   12     0        0
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8     215   40    53        0
MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      89   24    21    24000
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     285   72   143        0
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8     143   32    19    31000

delta: $-95,000
2025 balance: $-777,000
2025 blue distance: $777,000
balance: $15,520,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.45 (1413 of 3493)

Making the noney

Making the money in a tournament which allows re-entries doesn't guarantee you a profit. That stands to reason; if you reenter just once, but only min cash, it's virtually a guarantee that you'll take a net loss. Moreover, the more times you reenter, the more likely it is that you'll take a net loss. In my opinion, it never makes sense to reenter a tournament. I didn't come to that conclusion right away, but I got there in the end.

Making the money in a tournament which you didn't reenter should guarantee you a profit. Unfortunately, that isn't the case on PokerStars, at least for their play money tournaments. These tournaments are rare, but they exist. Even rarer are the tournaments where the payout for a min cash is exactly equal to the sum of the buy in and the entry fee, but they also exist. When I min cash in such a tournament, I call it "making the noney" :-)

Yesterday I made the noney in a Limit Razz tournament. To give you an idea how rare that is, I've played 3,488 MTT tournaments in my online poker career, and have only made the noney three times.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6     124   24    33        0
MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      93   24    21    25000
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8      66   12     0        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-682,000
2025 blue distance: $682,000
balance: $15,615,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.45 (1411 of 3488)

Unavoidable 0th places

0th places in MTT NLHE tournaments are entirely avoidable; simply pick tournaments whose late registration periods include a break at the end, and wait for the break to begin before joining. Of course, that would be a useless strategy if there were only a small chance of making the money by adopting it, but thankfully, that isn't the case for MTT NLHEs. However, it certainly is the case for MTT Limit tournaments. For one thing, Limits generally don't include a break at the end of their late registration periods. For another, their late registration periods are considerably longer. The longer a late registration period is, the less it makes sense to join the tournament late, since that guarantees you'll be a small stack battling against mostly much larger stacks.

Upshot #1: I have to join Limits earlier than I'm used to joining MTT NLHEs

Upshot #2: I need to accept the fact that I'll register way more 0th places

I'm not even sure I can make a long-term profit on Limits, but I mean to find out.

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     335   81    83        0
MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6     125   24    34        0
MTT   Stud       22000   3000       8     127   24    48        0
MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      39    7     0        0
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8      89   24     0        0

delta: $-150,000
2025 balance: $-632,000
2025 blue distance: $632,000
balance: $15,665,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.46 (1410 of 3485)

Cruel and unusual treatment

Over the years, I've picked up a lot of great phrases from people I admire. One such is "cruel and unusual treatment", which I picked up from my father. Yesterday, the poker gods subjected me to cruel and unusual treatment on the last hand of my session. I was playing Limit Stud Hi/Lo, and was short-stacked. I was dealt a pair of tens in the hole, and my door car was an eight. I shoved the rest of my chips into the middle (which was legal, since I had so few of them) and got a bunch of callers. I made a set of tens on 5th street, and made a full house, tens full of eights, on 6th street. I thought I had a mortal lock on the high hand, and continued reading an article on the New York Times website, confident that I'd get the good news that I'd won the high pot when the hand was over. Instead, the PokerStars window which popped up told me I was out of the tournament in 47th place. I didn't get to see which hand beat mine, but the odds are it was a better full house. Whatcha gonna do?

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      90   24    33        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     290   72    98        0
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8     148   32    47        0

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-482,000
2025 blue distance: $482,000
balance: $15,815,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.52 (1410 of 3480)

Never met an MTT Limit tournament I didn't like

Yesterday, I played my first ever Limit 7 Card Stud tournament. I was familiar with 7 Card Stud, as it's one of the games in 8-game tournaments, but I'd never played a tournament devoted exclusively to it. Even though I missed the money, I had a lot of fun, and will continue to play any and all MTT Limit tournaments in my price range :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   Stud       22000   3000       8     130   24    34        0
MTT   Razz       22000   3000       8      49   12     0        0

delta: $-50,000
2025 balance: $-382,000
2025 blue distance: $382,000
balance: $15,915,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.55 (1410 of 3477)

The beauty of limit poker

Yesterday, I played my first ever Limit Stud Hi/Lo tournament. I was familiar with Stud Hi/Lo, as it's one of the games in 8-game tournaments, but I'd never played a tournament devoted exclusively to it. As with Razz, I had a ton of fun, and made the money. I started my poker career playing limit poker, and playing it again is like being reunited with an old friend. There's a beauty to limit poker which no limit poker can't equal. Don't get me wrong, I won't stop playing no limit, but I'm going to play less of it, and more of limit. Limit is rejuvenating my enjoyment of poker :-)

style flavor    buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   L27Lo      22000   3000       6     109   24    26        0
MTT   NLHE       44000   6000       9     314   81    75    69000
MTT   Stud HiLo  22000   3000       8     158   32    14    52000

delta: $21,000
2025 balance: $-332,000
2025 blue distance: $332,000
balance: $15,965,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.58 (1410 of 3475)

Razzamatazz

Playing deuce on Friday for the first time in over 8 years was liberating. It made me realize I've been in a rut playing MTT NLHEs exclusively for so long. The last time before Friday that I'd played a variant other than MTT NLHE was way back on July 25, 2023, when I played a No Limit 5 card draw tournament. Yesterday, I played my first ever Limit Razz tournament. I was familiar with Razz, as it's one of the games in 8-game tournaments, but I'd never played a tournament devoted exclusively to it. I had a ton of fun. Not only did I make the money, I made it to the final table. I see lots of deuce, Razz, 8-game, and other variants in my future :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   Razz    22000   3000       8      86   16     5   122000

delta: $97,000
2025 balance: $-353,000
2025 blue distance: $353,000
balance: $15,944,303
MTT ITM pct: 40.55 (1408 of 3472)

Back to zero

The last time I recorded a 0th place in an MTT NLHE was on October 5. The next time I'll register a 0th place is - drumroll please - never.

This is an excerpt from my December 10, 2024 post. Famous last words :-) Yesterday, I registered a 0th place in the first MTT NLHE I entered. How could this happen? It was supposed to be impossible! There's a simple explanation - I entered a tournament whose late registration period ended before its first five minute break began. The $50,000 tournaments on PokerStars have the first five minute break start with five minutes left in their late registration period, but the $100,000 tournaments don't. That means a player can guarantee an official place in a $50,000 tournament by entering it within the first five minute break, but there's no such guarantee for $100,000 tournaments. Upshot: I won't enter any more $100,000 tournaments.

In other news, I played in my first limit deuce (2-7 Triple Draw Lowball) tournament in over 8 years. These tournaments have longer late registration periods than MTT NLHE tournaments do, so there's less shame in recording 0th places in them. I pre-registered, and lasted 42 of the 49 minutes in the late registration period before hitting the rail, recording a 0th place. Deuce is a lot of fun, and I'll be playing more of it.

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    88000  12000       9     278   72     0        0
MTT   L27Lo   22000   3000       6      72   18     0        0
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     332   81   149        0

delta: $-175,000
2025 balance: $-450,000
2025 blue distance: $450,000
balance: $15,847,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.55 (1284 of 3090)

The imp of the perverse

Wednesday night, I lost a ton of chips. $80K worth, to be precise. The maximum starting stake at two consecutive tables. Both hands that I rode to the felt, I had no business going all in on. What's more, I knew as I was going all in that I had no business doing it -- both times. Edgar Allan Poe called such behavior "the imp of the perverse".

This is an excerpt from my April 1, 2011 post. In yesterday's session, the imp struck again. In shouting distance of the money bubble, I hit the rail on a hand where I went all in after flopping top pair with a good kicker. The problem with my hand was that my top pair was pitiful - sixes. I should have folded that hand every day of the week and twice on Sundays :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    88000   1200       9      230   63    97       0

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-275,000
2025 blue distance: $275,000
balance: $16,022,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.58 (1284 of 3088)

Luft

One of the common checkmates in chess is the back rank checkmate. That's when one player moves a queen or a rook to the opponent's back rank, giving check to the king, and the opponent has no legal move. The opponent doesn't have a piece which can capture the attacking piece, doesn't have a piece which could move to a square in between the king's square and the square occupied by the attacking piece, and doesn't have an escape square for the king. It's common for players to remove the possibility of getting back rank checkmated by taking the time at some point in the game to move one of the pawns in front of the king up one or two squares, providing the king with an escape square. In chess terminology, this type of move is said to give luft (the German word for air) to the king.

Luft is required in poker also. In order to make the money in a tournament, a player must get a chip infusion at regular intervals. Poker chips can be likened to oxygen. When you don't have enough oxygen, you suffocate. Yesterday, in the one tournament I played, I was lucky enough to get three or four chip infusions, providing me with the luft I needed to make the money.

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    88000   1200       9     355   81    75   147000

delta: $47,000
2025 balance: $-175,000
2025 blue distance: $175,000
balance: $16,122,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.59 (1284 of 3087)

No silver lining

It's typically easier to write about winning sessions than losing ones. After losing, I often struggle to find the session's silver lining, but that's what I want to write about.

This is an excerpt from my June 6, 2016 post. I can't find a silver lining in yesterday's session. It was fairly short, and I don't remember any salient details. My streak of making it to Station 2 (outlasting at least half of the field) was stopped at ten. Time to start a new streak :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    88000   1200       9     155   45    84        0

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-222,000
2025 blue distance: $222,000
balance: $16,075,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.57 (1283 of 3086)

Pulling up stakes

I've decided it's time to pull up stakes again. I'm going to move from the $45,000 buy in level to the $90,000 buy in level. If I play as well at the higher stakes as I did at the lower stakes, I'll make twice the profit.

This is an excerpt from my June 1, 2015 post. I've decided to pull up stakes again. By mistake, I chose a $100,000 tournament instead of a $50,000 tournament at the end of yesterday's session, and made the money in it. I'm going to see how well I do playing at the higher stakes on purpose :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     327   81    79    69000
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     388   99   142        0
MTT   NLHE    88000   1200       9     323   81    66   170000

delta: $39,000
2025 balance: $-122,000
2025 blue distance: $122,000
balance: $16,175,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.59 (1283 of 3085)

Saved by two lovely ladies

There are three ways of having all your chips go into the middle:

1. the all in
2. the call in
3. the fall in

The all in is when the action is on you and you decide to put all your chips in the middle. The call in is when the action is on you and someone who bet before you bet big enough to put you all in if you call, and you decide to call. The fall in is when you're in the small blind or the big blind, and are so short-stacked that the forced bet puts you all in. You want to avoid the fall in at all costs, since it removes all decision-making from you.

This is an excerpt from my March 18, 2014 post. It's impossible to avoid falling in occasionally. When you do, you're at the whim of the poker gods. Sometimes they smile down at you; that's what happened to me in the second tournament I played yesterday. The gods gave me pocket queens when I fell in, and the two lovely ladies held up :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     416   99   139        0
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     231   63    27   116000

delta: $16,000
2025 balance: $-161,000
2025 blue distance: $161,000
balance: $16,136,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.56 (1281 of 3082)

Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said

Once again, I'm using the title of a novel I've never read as the title of a blog post. As before, it's written by an author I greatly admire (Philip K. Dick in this instance), whose work I've read widely. That title was what sprung to mind when I looked at the bar chart of my stack size over the course of last night's session. All the blue bars hanging below the zero line are like the tracks of so many tears.

This is an excerpt from my November 4, 2014 post. I haven't been able to look at a bar chart of my stack size over the course of a session since November of 2019, when I got a new computer and discovered that the PokerStars play money client no longer provided hand histories. However, I can always look at bar charts of my balance over the course of a poker year, and looking at the three data points I have for the current year, I see three tears. I have no doubt the flow will stop before long :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     326   81    92        0
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     400   99   117        0

delta: $-100,000
2025 balance: $-177,000
2025 blue distance: $177,000
balance: $16,120,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.56 (1280 of 3080)

A painful hand

As I've said before, it's easier to remember hands you lost than hands you won. Case in point: I don't remember any hands from yesterday's session, but do remember a painful one from the first tournament I played in the session before that, on New Year's day. The result was that I hit the rail very early on, not having even played ten hands. I was dealt the king and seven of hearts. The flop was two aces and a small card, where one of the aces and the small card were both hearts. The turn was a king, and the river was another heart, which gave me the nut flush. There were only two players left in the hand at that point, me being one. I went all in, and my opponent called. He turned over a big slick, which meant he had a full house, aces full of kings. Though I hadn't known it at the time, I'd actually been drawing dead on the river, since he'd hit his full house on the turn. Expletive deleted!

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     375   99    49   123000

delta: $73,000
2025 balance: $-77,000
2025 blue distance: $77,000
balance: $16,220,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.59 (1280 of 3078)

January 1 poker results over the years

In all the years I've played online poker, I've only managed to make a profit on January 1 three times. Here are the numbers, sorted by delta:

$-700,000  2018
$-300,000  2019
$-200,000  2023
$-200,000  2021
$-150,000  2025
 $-64,000  2024
 $-11,000  2022
  $-4,270  2015
  $42,300  2013
 $123,640  2016
 $205,000  2017

I take some solace from the fact that yesterday's loss was only my fifth worst :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     434  117   252        0
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     242   63   108        0
MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     198   54    78        0

delta: $-150,000
2025 balance: $-150,000
2025 blue distance: $150,000
balance: $16,147,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.57 (1279 of 3077)

My second homogeneous poker year

In 2009, the year I started recording my poker data, I played just one poker variant for the entire year, Cash game Pot Limit Hold'em. For the next 14 years, I played multiple poker variants during the course of each year. In 2024, I finally recorded a second homogeneous poker year. I played one variant only - MTT No Limit Hold'em. It's my bread and butter. I've made more play money with it than with any other variant by far. My career winnings playing it are over 113 million. Enough said :-)

style flavor buy_in  entry players entries paid place winnings

MTT   NLHE    44000   6000       9     324   81     8   277000

delta: $227,000
2024 balance: $3,488,000
2024 blue distance: $431,000
balance: $16,297,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.61 (1279 of 3074)