I often play two MTT NLHE tournaments in a session ... My MTT NLHE ITM percentage in these sessions is 41.19. What this shows is that the number of tournaments I play per session has no bearing on my ITM percentage. It would be weird if it did.
This is an excerpt from my November 12, 2024 post. It turns out I was wrong. I was only looking at two data points - my overall ITM percentage and my ITM percentage in sessions where I played in two tournaments. I needed to be looking at additional data points, namely my ITM percentage in sessions where I played either a single tournament, or more than two tournaments. Here are some revealing ITM percentages:
48.9459 (534 1091) one tournament played in session
41.1348 (348 846) two tournaments played in session
36.8132 (201 546) three tournaments played in session
31.8750 (102 320) four tournaments played in session
It's clear that the more tournaments I play in a session, the worse my ITM percentage gets. I now think it would be weird if it didn't :-)
style flavor buy_in entry players entries paid place winnings
MTT NLHE 44000 6000 9 319 81 75 70000
MTT NLHE 44000 6000 9 292 72 104 0
MTT NLHE 44000 6000 9 326 81 169 0
MTT NLHE 44000 6000 9 217 63 90 0
delta: $-130,000
2024 balance: $3,689,000
2024 blue distance: $230,000
balance: $16,498,303
MTT NLHE ITM pct: 41.70 (1277 of 3062)
No comments:
Post a Comment